Checking the security of your IT infrastructure does not have to mean buying into a closed, expensive solution. Open source vulnerability management uses a publicly viewable scanner core to find, assess and prioritise vulnerabilities, transparently rather than as a black box. This overview shows how far the approach carries on its own, and where a commercial add-on makes sense.

Key Takeaways
Open source vulnerability management means using publicly viewable, mostly GPL-licensed scan technology to systematically search your own IT for security gaps. OPENVAS is one such open source project: it emerged in 2005 as a fork of Nessus and has since been developed further with input from Germany's Federal Office for Information Security (BSI) and an active community. For full protection of business-critical systems, the commercial OPENVAS ENTERPRISE FEED adds daily updated tests and support on top of the open scanner core.
Key benefits include:
  • A fully inspectable, auditable scanner core instead of black-box technology
  • No dependency on a single vendor (no vendor lock-in)
  • Combinable with a commercial enterprise feed for business software and support

What Is Open Source Vulnerability Management?

Open source vulnerability management describes the use of security scanners whose source code is publicly available to automatically identify, assess and prioritise vulnerabilities in networks, servers and endpoints. The point is not primarily the licence price, but traceability: every detection routine can be inspected instead of having to rely solely on a vendor’s promise.

The term is often confused with a different discipline: securing open source components inside your own software, also known as software composition analysis. That is about finding vulnerabilities in the libraries a codebase depends on, not about the choice of scanning tool itself. Open source vulnerability management as described here instead means searching for vulnerabilities across the entire IT infrastructure with an openly viewable tool. The technical foundation for this is covered on the page IT Security & Information Security.

The best-known example is OPENVAS: it emerged in 2005, when its predecessor Nessus switched from an open to a proprietary licence. The scanner has since been developed under the GPL, originally with support from Germany’s BSI, and today under the stewardship of the German company Greenbone AG. The page OPENVAS vs. Nessus covers the history and a comparison with the commercial counterpart in more detail.

Benefits and Limits of the Open Approach

Whether an open scanner on its own is enough, or a commercial add-on makes sense, depends on your own IT environment:

What Speaks for the Open Approach

  • Fully inspectable source code instead of black-box technology
  • No dependency on a single vendor
  • Detection routines vetted by a worldwide community
  • Runs on-premises or in your own cloud, full control over data

Where the Open Approach Alone Falls Short

  • Community feed mainly covers home-user software
  • No contractually guaranteed response times or SLAs
  • Updates and operations are entirely your own responsibility
  • Limited evidence for audits and compliance requirements

This is exactly where the OPENVAS ENTERPRISE FEED comes in: it adds a commercially maintained, daily updated data set, compliance policies and vendor support on top of the open scanner core.

Open Source Vulnerability Management in Numbers

Current figures show how quickly the threat landscape is moving, and why purely manual review has its limits:

48,185 CVEs

newly published vulnerabilities in 2025, up 20.6% year-on-year and a new record

31%

of breaches analysed in the Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report (2026) trace back to vulnerability exploitation as the initial access vector, up from 20% in the previous year’s report

28%

of vulnerabilities reported in 2025 received full technical enrichment (CVSS, CWE, CPE) from the US National Vulnerability Database, well below the prior year

Sources: CVE Program (2025); Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report (2026); National Vulnerability Database, NIST (2025).

Where the Community Approach Falls Short

An overview of the most common limitations of relying solely on a free community scanner:

Delayed Signatures

Community tests are updated irregularly, so new vulnerabilities surface later than with a daily updated commercial feed.

Limited Coverage

Tests focus mainly on home-user products, while common business software such as Cisco, SAP or Palo Alto is only covered by the Enterprise Feed.

No Vendor Support

Questions and issues can only be raised in the community forum, there are no binding response times.

You Own the Operations

Operating, hardening and backing up the scan infrastructure is entirely your own responsibility, with no professional services to fall back on.

Missing Compliance Evidence

Without policy packages for CIS Benchmarks and similar standards, audit requirements can only be met to a limited extent.

No Automatic Product Updates

Free appliances such as OPENVAS FREE receive regular feed updates, but no automated update of the software itself.

Which Approach Fits Whom

Depending on company size and requirements, a different combination of open scanner and commercial feed makes sense:

Home Users & Single Setups

OPENVAS FREE offers a fast, free entry point using the Community Feed, ideal for trying things out without enterprise features.

Small Businesses

OPENVAS BASIC combines the open scanner core with the commercial Enterprise Feed at an affordable entry price, ready to go within minutes.

Mid-Size & Large Enterprises

OPENVAS SCAN adds sensors, API access and remediation tickets, bringing the open approach up to enterprise level.

Community Feed vs. Enterprise Feed

The key difference between the free and the commercial open source approach lies in the underlying feed:

Feature OPENVAS COMMUNITY FEED OPENVAS ENTERPRISE FEED
Cost Free Paid subscription
Home-user software coverage Yes Yes
Business software coverage No Yes
Update frequency Irregular Several times a day
Compliance policies (e.g. CIS Benchmarks) No Yes
Vendor support with SLA No Yes

Open Source Vulnerability Management with Greenbone

OPENVAS is itself an open source project: the scanner core is licensed under the GPL and developed further by the German company Greenbone AG. Depending on your needs, it can run on the free Community Feed or the commercial Enterprise Feed.

Vulnerability management for small businesses and single setups, ready to go within minutes and free to try for 14 days.

Checklist: Does the Open Approach Fit Your IT?

A first, concrete plan to find the right open source approach for your IT:

  • Check what share of your IT is home-user software versus business software
  • Try the Community Feed to judge its scope and freshness for yourself
  • Define the support level you need: self-service or contractually guaranteed response times
  • Match compliance requirements such as CIS Benchmarks with your relevant department
  • Consider the Enterprise Feed for business-critical systems
  • Try OPENVAS BASIC free for 14 days
  • Review the approach regularly and adjust it as your IT environment grows

Frequently Asked Questions about Open Source Vulnerability Management

Open source vulnerability management means using scan technology with publicly viewable source code to find, assess and prioritise vulnerabilities in your own IT infrastructure.

No. That discipline is about securing open source libraries inside your own software, also known as software composition analysis. Open source vulnerability management instead refers to choosing an open scanning tool for the entire IT infrastructure.

Yes, the OPENVAS scanner core is licensed under the GPL and freely viewable. The commercial products OPENVAS BASIC and OPENVAS SCAN add a paid Enterprise Feed and support on top of this open core.

The Community Feed mainly covers home-user software and is updated irregularly. The Enterprise Feed additionally tests common business software, is updated several times a day and includes compliance policies and support.

For a first step or private environments, yes. Once business software is in use or compliance evidence is required, the commercial Enterprise Feed usually becomes necessary.

Publicly viewable source code is reviewed by a wide community, which often surfaces flaws faster than in closed software. However, the actual detection rate still depends on how current the tests being used are.

The scanner itself is free to use. Costs only arise from the optional Enterprise Feed, priced according to the environment being scanned, ranging from a few euros a month to larger enterprise licences.

Classic vulnerability management describes the general process of identifying, assessing and remediating vulnerabilities, regardless of the tool used. Open source vulnerability management additionally focuses on choosing transparent, openly viewable scan technology as the basis for that process.

Ready for More Transparency in Your Vulnerability Management?

Let’s work out together whether the open approach is enough for your IT, or where a commercial add-on makes sense.