Tag Archive for: BSI

Markus Feilner

Municipalities, authorities and companies under pressure: serious attacks on the rise, NIS2 becomes mandatory

After experts noticed a rapid increase in cyberattacks on local authorities and government agencies in 2023, the horror stories don’t stop in 2024. The pressure to act is enormous, as the EU’s NIS2 Directive will come into force in October and makes risk and vulnerability management mandatory.

“The threat level is higher than ever,” said Claudia Plattner, President of the German Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), at Bitkom in early March. The question is not whether an attack will be successful, but only when. The BSI’s annual reports, for example the most recent report from 2023, also speak volumes in this regard. However, according to Plattner, it is striking how often local authorities, hospitals and other public institutions are at the centre of attacks. There is “not a problem with measures but with implementation in companies and authorities”, said Plattner. One thing is clear: vulnerability management such as Greenbone’s can provide protection and help to avoid the worst.

US authorities infiltrated by Chinese hackers

In view of the numerous serious security incidents, vulnerability management is becoming more important every year. Almost 70 new security vulnerabilities have been added every day in recent months. Some of them opened the door to attackers deep inside US authorities, as reported in the Greenbone Enterprise Blog:

According to the media, US authorities have been infiltrated by Chinese hacker groups such as the probably state-sponsored “Volt Typhoon” for years via serious security gaps. The fact that Volt Typhoon and similar groups are a major problem was even confirmed by Microsoft itself in a blog back in May 2023. But that’s not all: German media reported that Volt Typhoon is taking advantage of the abundant vulnerabilities in VPN gateways and routers from FortiNet, Ivanti, Netgear, Citrix and Cisco. These are currently considered to be particularly vulnerable.

The fact that the quasi-monopolist in Office, groupware, operating systems and various cloud services also had to admit in 2023 that it had the master key for large parts of its Microsoft cloud let stolen destroyed trust in the Redmond software manufacturer in many places. Anyone who has this key doesn’t need a backdoor for Microsoft systems any longer. Chinese hackers are also suspected in this case.

Software manufacturers and suppliers

The supply chain for software manufacturers has been under particular scrutiny by manufacturers and users not only since log4j or the European Cyber Resilience Act. The recent example of the attack on the XZ compression algorithm in Linux also shows the vulnerability of manufacturers. In the case of the “#xzbackdoor”, a combination of pure coincidence and the activities of Andres Freund, a German developer of open source software for Microsoft with a strong focus on performance, prevented the worst from happening.

An abyss opened up here: It was only thanks to open source development and a joint effort by the community that it came to light that actors had been using changing fake names with various accounts for years with a high level of criminal energy and with methods that would otherwise be more likely to be used by secret services. With little or no user history, they used sophisticated social scams, exploited the notorious overload of operators and gained the trust of freelance developers. This enabled them to introduce malicious code into software almost unnoticed. In the end, it was only thanks to Freund’s interest in performance that the attack was discovered and the attempt to insert a backdoor into a tool failed.

US officials also see authorities and institutions as being particularly threatened in this case, even if the attack appears to be rather untargeted and designed for mass use. The issue is complex and far from over, let alone fully understood. One thing is certain: the usernames of the accounts used by the attackers were deliberately falsified. We will continue to report on this in the Greenbone blog.

European legislators react

Vulnerability management cannot prevent such attacks, but it provides indispensable services by proactively warning and alerting administrators as soon as such an attack becomes known – usually before an attacker has been able to compromise systems. In view of all the difficulties and dramatic incidents, it is not surprising that legislators have also recognised the magnitude of the problem and are declaring vulnerability management to be standard and best practice in more and more scenarios.

Laws and regulations such as the EU’s new NIS2 directive make the use of vulnerability management mandatory, including in the software supply chain. Even if NIS2 only actually applies to around 180,000 organisations and companies in the critical infrastructure (KRITIS) or “particularly important” or “significant” companies in Europe, the regulations are fundamentally sensible – and will be mandatory from October. The EU Commission emphasises that “operators of essential services” must “take appropriate security measures and inform the competent national authorities of serious incidents”. Important providers of digital services such as search engines, cloud computing services and online marketplaces must fulfil the security and notification requirements of the directive.”

Mandatory from October: A “minimum set of cyber security measures”

The “Directive on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union (NIS2)” forces companies in the European Union to “implement a benchmark of minimum cybersecurity measures”, including risk management, training, policies and procedures, also and especially in cooperation with software suppliers. In Germany, the federal states are to define the exact implementation of the NIS2 regulations.

Do you have any questions about NIS2, the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA), vulnerability management in general or the security incidents described? Write to us! We look forward to working with you to find the right compliance solution and give your IT infrastructure the protection it needs in the face of today’s serious attacks.

To make our ecological progress even more sustainable, we keep up to date with regular internal training courses on energy efficiency. In this way, we are helping to make the world even “greener” outside of Greenbone.

Contact Test Now Buy Here Back to Overview

/by
Greenbone AG

The new SMP federal portal in partnership with the Federal Office for Information Security (BSI)

We at Greenbone are excited to introduce the innovative Greenbone SMP-Bund-Portal in collaboration with the Federal Office for Information Security (BSI). As a leading provider of IT security solutions, we are proud to offer this platform specifically tailored to the needs of federal agencies.

A Portal Setting Standards

The Greenbone SMP-Bund-Portal is the central point of contact for IT security and vulnerability management. It has been developed to provide agencies with concrete support in addressing current IT security challenges.

Many Advantages for Federal Agencies

  1. Easy-to-Understand Insights: The portal offers clear and user-friendly information about vulnerability management. It is ideal for both beginners and experts in IT security.
  2. Exclusive Framework Contract Conditions: Federal agencies enjoy special offers and benefits. The obligation to issue public tenders is eliminated, saving time and resources.
  3. Personal Support: Our competent support team is always at our customers’ side to answer questions and ensure support.
  4. Direct Access to the Agency Sales Team: Expert advice from our team, which is well-versed in the specific requirements of federal agencies. We look forward to furthering our trusted collaboration with the BSI and are available for any questions.
  5. Opportunity for Exchange: Use the shared forum to share your experiences and questions.

https://smp-bund.greenbone.net/

Contact Free Trial Buy Here Back to Overview

/by
Greenbone AG

IT security update November 2023: Critical vulnerabilities and threats

In the November 2023 commVT Intelligence Update, several critical vulnerabilities and security threats have come to light. Cisco’s Internetworking Operating System (IOS) XE Software Web User Interface (UI) was found to be vulnerable to two actively exploited critical vulnerabilities, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code remotely. The curl command-line tool, widely used across various platforms, faced a serious vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution during SOCKS5 proxy handshakes. VMware is urging immediate updates for its vCenter Server due to a critical vulnerability potentially leading to remote code execution. Multiple vulnerabilities were found in versions of PHP 8; one is a particularly critical deserialization vulnerability in the PHAR extraction process. Additionally, SolarWinds Access Rights Manager (ARM) was found susceptible to multiple critical vulnerabilities, emphasizing the urgency to update to version 2023.2.1. Lastly, two F5 BIG-IP vulnerabilities were discovered to be actively exploited, with mitigation options available and outlined below.

Cisco IOS XE: Multiple Critical Vulnerabilities

Two actively exploited critical CVSS 10 vulnerabilities were discovered in Cisco’s Internetworking Operating System (IOS) XE Software Web User Interface (UI); CVE-2023-20198 and CVE-2023-20273. Combined, they allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code as the system user and are estimated to have been used to exploit tens of thousands of vulnerable devices within the past few weeks. Greenbone has added detection for both the vulnerable product by version [1], and another aimed at detecting the BadCandy implanted configuration file [2]. Both are VTs included in Greenbone’s Enterprise vulnerability feed.

Cisco IOS was created in the 1980s and used as the embedded OS in the networking technology giant’s routers. Fast forward to 2023, IOS XE is a leading enterprise networking full-stack software solution that powers Cisco platforms for access, distribution, core, wireless, and WAN. IOS XE is Linux-based, and specially optimized for networking and IT infrastructure, routing, switching, network security, and management. Cisco devices are pervasive in global IT infrastructure and used by organizations of all sizes, including large-scale enterprises, government agencies, critical infrastructure, and educational institutions.

Here’s how the two recently disclosed CVEs work:

• CVE-2023-20198 (CVSS 10 Critical): Allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to create an account [T1136] on an affected system with privilege level 15 (aka privileged EXEC level) access [CWE-269]. Privilege level 15 is the highest level of access to Cisco IOS. The attacker can then use that account to gain control of the affected system.
• CVE-2023-20273 (CVSS 7.2 High): A regular user logged into the IOS XE web UI, can inject commands [CWE-77] that are subsequently executed on the underlying system with the system (root) privileges. This vulnerability is caused by insufficient input validation [CWE-20]. CVE is also associated with a Lua-based web-shell [T1505.003] implant dubbed “BadCandy”. BadCandy consists of an Nginx configuration file named `cisco_service.conf` that establishes a URI path to interact with the web-shell implant but requires the webserver to be restarted.

Cisco has released software updates for mitigating both CVEs in IOS XE software releases, including versions 17.9, 17.6, 17.3, and 16.12 as well as available Software Maintenance Upgrades (SMUs) and IT security teams are strongly advised to urgently install them. Cisco has also released associated indicators of compromise (IoC), Snort rules for detecting active attacks, and a TAC Technical FAQs page. Disabling the web UI prevents exploitation of these vulnerabilities and may be suitable mitigation until affected devices can be upgraded. Publicly released proof of concept (PoC) code [1][2] and a Metasploit module further increase the urgency to apply the available security updates.

Critical Vulnerability In The Curl Tool

A widespread vulnerability has been discovered in the popular curl command line tool, libcurl, and the many software applications that leverage them across a wide number of platforms. Tracked as CVE-2023-38545 (CVSS 9.8 Critical), the flaw makes curl overflow a heap-based buffer [CWE-122]] in the SOCKS5 proxy handshake that can result in arbitrary code execution [T1203]. Greenbone’s community feed includes several NVTs [1] to detect many of the affected software products and will add additional detections for CVE-2023-38545 as more vulnerable products are identified.

CVE-2023-38545 is a client-side vulnerability exploitable when passing a hostname to the SOCKS5 proxy that exceeds the maximum length of 255 bytes. If supplied with an excessively long hostname, curl is supposed to use local name resolution and pass it on to the resolved address only. However, due to the CVE-2023-38545 flaw, curl may actually copy the overly long hostname to the target buffer instead of copying just the resolved address there. The target buffer, being a heap-based buffer, and the hostname coming from the URL results in the heap-based overflow.

While the severity of the vulnerability is considered high because it can be exploited remotely and has a high impact to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of the underlying system, the SOCKS5 proxy method is not the default connection mode and must be declared explicitly. Additionally, for an overflow to happen an attacker also needs to cause a slow enough SOCKS5 handshake to trigger the bug. All versions of curl are affected between v7.69.0 (released March 4th, 2020) until v8.3.0. The vulnerable code was patched in v8.4.0 commit 4a4b63daaa.

VMware vCenter Server: Multiple Vulnerabilities

CVE-2023-34048 is a critical severity vulnerability that could allow a malicious actor with network access to vCenter Server to cause an out-of-bounds write [CWE-787] potentially leading to remote code execution (RCE). The affected software includes VMware vCenter Server versions 6.5, 6.7, 7.0, and 8.0. VMWare has issued a security advisory to address both vulnerabilities which states that there are no known mitigations other than installing the provided updates. Both vulnerabilities can be detected by Greenbone’s enterprise vulnerability feed [1]. The vCenter Server patch also fixes CVE-2023-34056, a medium-severity information disclosure resulting from improper authorization [CWE-285].

Although there are no reports that CVE-2023-34048 is being actively exploited in the wild attackers have proven adept at swiftly converting threat intelligence into exploit code. Research by Palo Alto Networks Unit 42 threat research group shows that on average an exploit is published 37 days after a security patch is released.

Here are some brief details on both CVEs:

• CVE-2023-34048 (CVSS 9.8 Critical): vCenter Server contains an out-of-bounds write [CWE-787] vulnerability in the implementation of the DCERPC protocol. A malicious actor with network access to vCenter Server may trigger this vulnerability to achieve remote code execution (RCE). The Distributed Computing Environment Remote Procedure Call (DCERPC) protocol facilitates remote procedure calls (RPC) in distributed computing environments, allowing applications to communicate and invoke functions across networked systems.
• CVE-2023-34056 (CVSS 4.3 Medium): vCenter Server contains a partial information disclosure vulnerability. A malicious actor with non-administrative privileges to vCenter Server may leverage this issue to access unauthorized data.

Multiple Vulnerabilities Discovered In PHP 8

Several vulnerabilities were identified in PHP 8.0.X before 8.0.28, 8.1.X before 8.1.16 and 8.2.X before 8.2.3. Although the group of vulnerabilities does include one critical and two high-severity vulnerabilities, these require particular contexts to be present for exploitation; either deserializing PHP applications using PHAR or else using PHP’s core path resolution functions on untrusted input. Greenbone’s enterprise VT feed includes multiple detection tests for these vulnerabilities across multiple platforms.

Here are brief descriptions of the most severe recent PHP 8 vulnerabilities:

• CVE-2023-3824 (CVSS 9.8 Critical): A PHAR file (short for PHP Archive) is a compressed packaging format in PHP, which is used to distribute and deploy complete PHP applications in a single archive file. While reading directory entries during the PHAR archive loading process, insufficient length checking may lead to a stack buffer overflow [CWE-121], potentially leading to memory corruption or remote code execution (RCE).
• CVE-2023-0568 (CVSS 8.1 High): PHP’s core path resolution function allocates a buffer one byte too small. When resolving paths with lengths close to the system `MAXPATHLEN` setting, this may lead to the byte after the allocated buffer being overwritten with NULL value, which might lead to unauthorized data access or modification. PHP’s core path resolution is used for the `realpath()` and `dirname()` functions, when including other files using the `include()`, `include_once()`, `require()`, and `require_once()`, and during the process of resolving PHP’s “magic” constants” such as `__FILE__` and `__DIR__`.
• CVE-2023-0567 (CVSS 6.2 Medium): PHP’s `password_verify()` function may accept some invalid Blowfish hashes as valid. If such an invalid hash ever ends up in the password database, it may lead to an application allowing any password for this entry as valid [CWE-287]. Notably, this vulnerability has been assigned different CVSS scores by NIST (CVSS 6.2 Medium) and the PHP group CNA (CVSS 7.7 High), the difference being that the PHP Group CNA considers CVE-2023-0567 a high risk to confidentiality while NIST does not. CNAs are a group of independent vendors, researchers, open source software developers, CERT, hosted service, and bug bounty organizations authorized by the CVE Program to assign CVE IDs and publish CVE records within their own specific scopes of coverage.

SolarWinds Access Rights Manager (ARM): Multiple Critical Vulnerabilities

SolarWinds Access Rights Manager (ARM) prior to version 2023.2.1 is vulnerable to 8 different exploits; one critical and two additional high-severity vulnerabilities (CVE-2023-35182, CVE-2023-35185, and CVE-2023-35187). These include authenticated and unauthenticated privilege escalation [CWE-269], directory traversal [CWE-22], and remote code execution (RCE) at the most privileged “SYSTEM” level. Greebone’s Enterprise vulnerability feed includes both local security check (LSC) [1] and remote HTTP detection [2].

SolarWinds ARM is an enterprise access control software for Windows Active Directory (AD) networks and other resources such as Windows File Servers, Microsoft Exchange services, and Microsoft SharePoint as well as virtualization environments, cloud services, NAS devices, and more. The widespread use of ARM and other SolarWinds software products means that its vulnerabilities have a high potential to impact a wide range of large organizations including critical infrastructure.

These and more recent vulnerabilities are disclosed in SolarWinds’ security advisories. Although no reports of active exploitation have been released, mitigation is highly recommended and available by installing SolarWinds ARM version 2023.2.1.

F5 BIG-IP: Unauthenticated RCE And Authenticated SQL Injection Vulnerabilities

Two RCE vulnerabilities in F5 BIG-IP, CVE-2023-46747 (CVSS 9.8 Critical) and CVE-2023-46748 (CVSS 8.8 High), have been observed by CISA to be actively exploited in the wild soon after PoC code was released for CVE-2023-46747. A Metasploit exploit module has also since been published. F5 BIG-IP is a family of hardware and software IT security products for ensuring that applications are always secure and perform the way they should. The platform is produced by F5 Networks, and it focuses on application services ranging from access and delivery to security. Greenbone has added detection for both CVEs [1][2].

CVE-2023-46747 is a remote authentication bypass [CWE-288] vulnerability while CVE-2023-46748 is a remote SQL injection vulnerability [CWE-89] that can only be exploited by an authenticated user. The affected products include the second minor release (X.1) for major versions 14-17 of BIG-IP Advanced Firewall Manager (AFM) and F5 Networks BIG-IP Application Security Manager (ASM).

If you are running an affected version you can eliminate this vulnerability by installing the vendor-provided HOTFIX updates [1][2]. The term “hotfix” implies that the patch can be applied to a system while it is running and operational, without the need for a shutdown or reboot. If updating is not an option, CVE-2023-46747 can be mitigated by downloading and running a bash script that adds or updates the `requiredSecret` attribute in the Tomcat configuration, which is used for authentication between Apache and Tomcat, and CVE-2023-46748 can be mitigated by restricting access to the Configuration utility to allow only trusted networks or devices, and ensuring only trusted user accounts exist thereby limiting the attack surface.


Contact Free Trial Buy Here Back to Overview

/by
Markus Feilner

CVE News: Critical vulnerabilities Atlassian and F5 Big vulnerability tests released by Greenbone

Our developers have provided vulnerability tests for two critical vulnerabilities in widely used enterprise software. Within a very short time, tests for CVE 2023-22518 und CVE 2023-46747 were integrated, and customers of Greenbone’s Enterprise Feed were protected.

Knowledge management tools Confluence and Jira from Australian vendor Atlassian have been hit by a serious security vulnerability, rated 9.8 out of 10 on the CERT scale. Since November 8, CVE 2023-22518 has been actively exploited by attackers gaining unauthorized access to company data, according to media reports.

According to the company, the “authentication flaw” affects all versions of Confluence Data Center and Server, but not the cloud version at Atlassian itself. For anyone else, including users of Jira, but especially all publicly accessible Confluence servers, there is a “high risk and need to take immediate action”, writes Atlassian.

We reacted quickly and provided our customers with appropriate tests before ransomware attacks could be successful. Customers of the Greenbone Enterprise Feed were warned and reminded of the patch via update.

Remote code execution: F5 BIG-IP allows request smuggling

Also at the end of October, security researchers from Praetorian Labs discovered a serious vulnerability (CVE-2023-46747) in the products of application security expert F5. The American company’s solutions are designed to protect large networks and software environments; the software, which was launched in 1997 as a load balancer, is primarily used in large enterprises.

However, according to the experts, attackers can remotely execute code on the BIG-IP servers by adding arbitrary system commands to the administration tools via manipulated URLs. Details can be found at Praetorian; patches are available, and a long list of BIG-IP products of versions 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17 are affected, both in hardware and software.

We reacted quickly and integrated tests into its vulnerability scanners on the same day, which test the BIG-IP installations at Greenbone Enterprise for vulnerable versions and, if necessary, point to the patches listed at F5.

Our vulnerability management products, the Greenbone Enterprise Appliances, offer the best protection.

Professional vulnerability management is an indispensable part of IT security. It enables the early detection of risks and provides valuable instructions for their elimination.
The Greenbone Enterprise Feed is updated daily to detect new vulnerabilities. We therefore recommend that you regularly update and scan all your systems. Please also read this article on IT security and the timeline of common attack vectors.


Contact Free Trial Buy Here Back to Overview

/by
Elmar Geese

Current Report on the State of IT Security in Germany 2023

On November 2, Federal Minister of the Interior Nancy Faeser and Claudia Plattner, President of the Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), presented the latest report on the state of IT security in Germany. Attacks with ransomware represent the largest and most frequent risk, but by far not the only one. As long as these attacks cannot be completely prevented, systems must become more secure in order to prevent or at least reduce damage.

In Germany, there are a number of initiatives to improve vulnerability management. These include the National IT Security Act (IT-SiG) and the BSI’s IT-Grundschutz Compendium. The “nationwide situation picture” rightly called for by BSI President Claudia Plattner can thus map the threat situation to the situation of vulnerable systems, thereby helping to warn in advance and respond quickly and effectively in the specific event of an attack.

“Digitization makes many things in our everyday lives easier. At the same time, it creates new areas of attack,” says Federal Minister of the Interior Nancy Faeser. We need to counter the growing risks posed by progressive networking with automated tools and processes. By using them, companies and organizations can better protect their IT systems and reduce the probability of a successful cyber attack.

Insecure systems make it easier for attackers to cause damage. Improving vulnerability management is therefore an important step toward increasing IT security in Germany.Insecure systems make it easier for attackers to wreak havoc. Improving vulnerability management is therefore an important step towards increasing IT security in Germany.

Contact Free Trial Buy Here Back to Overview

/by
Markus Feilner

“Vulnerability management is becoming increasingly important” – Greenbone CEO Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner at PITS Congress

Every year, IT and cyber security experts from public authorities, federal, state and local governments as well as the armed forces, police and intelligence services meet for the cyber security congress “Public IT Security” (PITS), initiated by Behoerdenspiegel. In 2023, the topic of vulnerabilities was once again at the top of the agenda.

This year, our CEO Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner was invited as an expert to take part in the panel discussion “Putting a finger on a wound – managing or closing vulnerabilities?” Moderated by Katharina Sook Hee Koch from the Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), the panel included representatives from the German Informatics Society (Nikolas Becker, Head of Policy & Science), the Bundestag Committee on Digital Affairs (MdB Catarina dos Santos-Wintz, CDU/CSU), the BSI itself (Dr. Dirk Häger, Head of Department Operative Cyber Security) for an exchange of views. Dirk Kunze from the North Rhine-Westphalia State Criminal Police Office (Head of the Cybercrime/Cyber Investigations Department in the Research and Investigation Centre) was present on behalf of the executive.

Panel discussion at the cyber security congress PITS 2023 with Greenbone CEO Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner and representatives of the BSI, Bundestag, LKA NRW and Gesellschaft für Informatik on the topic of vulnerability management.

from left: Catarina dos Santos-Wintz, Dirk Kunze, Katharina Sook Hee Koch, Dr. Dirk Häger, Dr. Jan Oliver Wagner, Nikolas Becker (Photo: Greenbone AG)

Should vulnerabilities be closed? By all means!

The debate quickly centered on the question of whether and how (quickly) vulnerabilities in software should be closed and/or whether this would impair the work of investigative authorities. There was great unanimity among those present that the security of citizens had the highest priority. Keeping vulnerabilities open, even for political reasons, is hardly an option, both for cost reasons (exploits are expensive) and in risk assessment.

On the contrary, open-source software should be strengthened and more rewards (bug bounties) should be offered to experts who actively search for vulnerabilities. The BSI is also firmly convinced: “Basically, vulnerabilities must be closed.” (Häger). In criminal practice, the topic apparently plays a subordinate role anyway: the police, according to the LKA in North Rhine-Westphalia, know of only a few cases where it could have helped to keep vulnerabilities open. However, open vulnerabilities are still seen as a possible element for investigations. But of course, the decision of the politicians will be followed.

Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner: “Vulnerability management is becoming increasingly important!”

Greenbone CEO Wagner warns that the number of open vulnerabilities will increase rather than decrease in the coming years. This is despite the fact that good progress is being made with regard to security in software development. However, the regulations and thus the pressure on companies by the legislator are also becoming stricter – not necessarily a bad thing, but it does create a need for action: “The upcoming Common Security Advisory Framework (CSAF 2.0) and the EU’s Cyber Resilience Act (CRA), will significantly increase the number of known vulnerabilities.”

The CSAF makes it easier for manufacturers to report vulnerabilities, while the Cyber Resilience Act also brings responsibility to the hoover manufacturer, i.e. to all parts of the economy. If you don’t want to lose track of this, you need vulnerability management like Greenbone’s, explains Wagner. “Upcoming regulations bring the issue of vulnerabilities into all parts of the economy, as now every manufacturer is responsible for the security of the devices and their software, including, for example, manufacturers for hoover robots or other smart household appliances – For the entire life of the product!”

Vulnerability management is risk management

Vulnerability management today is pure risk management for the professional user, as it is already practiced in insurance companies – decisions are made about which vulnerabilities need to be closed and which can or must wait (triage).

This is exactly where our vulnerability management products come in – as a hardware or as a virtual appliance. Greenbone develops an open source vulnerability management and allows users to detect vulnerabilities in their own network infrastructure within a few steps. Our products generate reports with concrete instructions for action that you can implement immediately.

We work strictly according GDPR Compliance and offer an open source solution. This means best data protection compliance and is thus guaranteed free of backdoors.


Contact Free Trial Buy Here Back to Overview

/by
Markus Feilner

Greenbone tests your web applications

Reduce the risk of an attack from the internet on your servers: Take advantage of Greenbone’s latest offer: With our Pentesting Web Applications, we help you to get the best possible security for your web applications.

The numbers speak for themselves: attacks on web applications are on the rise, have been for years, and there is no end in sight. The complexity of modern web presences and services requires a high level of security measures and cannot be managed without testing by experts.

The only thing that helps here is the technique of so-called “pentesting” of web applications, or more precisely “web application penetration testing”. With this attempt to penetrate protected systems from the outside (“penetration”), Greenbone’s experts create an active analysis of vulnerabilities and can thus evaluate the security of a web application. Although there are guidelines such as the highly recommended one from the German Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), which describes the procedure for testing, nothing can replace the expert who puts your system under the microscope himself. In this video you will get a first impression of the work of our security experts. 

Greenbone acts strictly according to the regulations of the DSGVO, is certified according to ISO 27001/9001. As with its vulnerability management products, with the web application pentests you also receive detailed reports on your security situation with clear instructions for action, which the Greenbone experts are happy to help you implement. The offer covers both the client and server side of your web applications and is based on the most modern and up-to-date guidelines, for example the OWASP Top 10 or the OWASP Risk Assessment Framework (RAF). Whether it is cross-site scripting (XSS), SQL injection, information disclosure or command injection, whether there are gaps in the authentication mechanisms of your servers or websockets are the source of danger – Greenbone’s experts will find the vulnerabilities.

As the world’s leading provider of open source vulnerability management products, Greenbone always has the latest expertise in dealing with vulnerabilities and security risks, including here in “black box testing”, when our experts take a close look at your systems from the outside, just as an attacker would: with the perspective of a potential attacker, you will ideally find every existing vulnerability in your IT infrastructure and can take care of fixing them. Only those who know their vulnerabilities can implement security measures in a targeted manner. Find out more about Greenbone AG’s products and services here.

Contact Free Trial Buy Here Back to Overview

/by
Markus Feilner

BSI warns: Log4J remains a problem

Even more than two years after the first problems with Log4j became known, many scenarios are apparently still running unpatched versions of the logging library.

Greenbone’s products help – especially in detecting outdated software.

No one should take Log4j lightly as a done deal just because the vulnerability (CVE 2021-44228) has actually been fixed for a year and a half. That is the conclusion of an event at the end of March in which the German Federal Office for Information Security (BSI) issued an urgent warning. The vulnerability affected Log4j versions 2.0 to 2.14.1 and allowed attackers to execute their own programme code on target systems and compromise third-party servers. Greenbone’s products have detected the Log4j vulnerabilities since December 2021 and can therefore warn administrators.

Under the title “Log4j & Consequences” in the series “BuntesBugBounty“, the BSI spoke with Christian Grobmeier from the Log4j team and Brian Behlendorf from the Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF). Shockingly, more than a third of the downloads on the Log4j website still add up to outdated versions that do not contain the important patch – it can be assumed that numerous systems in companies are still vulnerable.

This is mainly due to third-party software that Log4j embeds or integrates via software distribution – which is not at all surprising to Grobmeier, because that is how the supply chain works with open-source software. According to the Log4J developer, nothing can be changed in the near future.

This is also confirmed by the Open SSF: for Behlendorf, only stricter liability for software producers could be helpful, as is already being considered in the USA. Without fundamentally new approaches, the problems are unlikely to change.

Those who nevertheless want to protect themselves permanently against attacks on known vulnerabilities that have already been patched should take a look at Greenbone’s products. Only professional vulnerability management gives administrators an overview of outdated software versions and unpatched gaps in the company’s systems – and thus creates the basis for further security measures.

The development of vulnerability tests is a key activity at Greenbone and a continuous process that ensures the high quality of the products and thus the high benefit for customers. Security checks are carried out every day and vulnerability tests are developed and integrated into the products daily as well, prioritized by the security situation. In the case of critical security warnings, as with Log4j, Greenbone reports on the current status, the facts and how to deal with them, for example in the blog posts about Log4j.


Contact Free Trial Buy Here Back to Overview

/by
Markus Feilner

Orange Security Report: Many old vulnerabilities still open

According to the latest study by Orange Security, 13 percent of the vulnerabilities found in today’s corporate networks were already known in 2012, and almost half of all gaps are more than five years old – and the trend is increasing. Professional vulnerability management such as the Greenbone product family can provide a remedy.

The Orange Security Navigator takes a look at the current threat situation on many pages every year. In the latest edition, the security software manufacturer comes to astonishing insights regarding the age of vulnerabilities in companies. The oldest risks have existed for 20 years or more, writes Orange, and patching is also taking longer and longer.

Even recently, problems that were actually fixed long ago filled the headlines: A security hole in VMWare’s ESXi server, which had been closed for years, was actively exploited by attackers. According to the German Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), thousands of servers were infected with ransomware and encrypted – details here in the Greenbone blog.

Orange Security can also sing from the same song: “Our pentesters find vulnerabilities that were first identified in 2010 (…) [and] problems whose causes go back to 1999. (…) This is a very worrying result.” In the case of the ESXi incident, the vulnerability had already been closed by the manufacturer in February 2021, but not all users had applied the necessary updates – which is exactly where Greenbone’s products help by actively scanning your systems for known, open vulnerabilities.

This is becoming increasingly important because, even according to Orange, more and more critical gaps are sometimes open for six months or longer, In recent years, the average time to a fix has increased by 241 percent. While patching of serious vulnerabilities is on average one-third faster than for less critical threats, the maximum time required to apply a patch is a concern: “Whether critical or not, some patches take years to apply.

Only one-fifth of all vulnerabilities found are fixed in less than 30 days, the study explains, while 80% remain open for more than a month. On average, it takes a full 215 days for gaps to be closed. Of the vulnerabilities waiting 1000 days for a patch, 16% were classified as severe, with three-quarters of medium threat, it said. In the case of the ESXi vulnerability, there has been an alert for two years, a high-risk classification and also a patch to fix it. Despite this, a large number of organizations have been successfully attacked by exploiting the vulnerability.

The problem is well known: Calls for vulnerability and patch management from data protection regulators, for example, are a regular occurrence. “I look at the topic of information security with concern. On the one hand, many organizations still haven’t done their homework to eliminate known vulnerabilities in IT systems – the data breach reports show us how such vulnerabilities are exploited again and again, and often data can be leaked.” Marit Hansen, Schleswig-Holstein State Commissioner for Data Protection, February 2022.

When it comes to cybersecurity, companies face major challenges, she said: More than 22 vulnerabilities with CVE are published every day, with an average CVSS score of 7 or more, she said. Without professional vulnerability management, this can no longer be handled, Orange also explains.

This makes the early detection and recording of vulnerabilities in the company all the more important. Greenbone products can take a lot of the work out of this and provide security – as a hardware or virtual appliance or as a cloud service. The Greenbone Enterprise Feed, from which all Greenbone security products are fed, receives daily updates and thus covers a high percentage of risks. Our security experts have been researching the topic for over 10 years, so we can detect risks even in grown structures.

Vulnerability management is an indispensable part of IT security. It can find risks and provides valuable information on how to eliminate them. However, there is no such thing as one hundred percent security, and there is no single measure that is sufficient to achieve the maximum level of security – vulnerability management is an important building block. Only the totality of the systems deployed, together with comprehensive data protection and cyber security concepts, is the best possible security.


Contact Free Trial Buy Here Back to Overview

/by
Markus Feilner

German BSI warns of vulnerability in VMware ESXi

A new wave of ransomware attacks has been threatening numerous servers in Europe. The attacks focus on the hypervisors in VMware’s virtualization server ESXi.
Patches are available, Greenbone’s products can protect and help to find the vulnerability.

The German BSI explicitly warns of the vulnerability and in its latest information on the security situation speaks of thousands of servers and a worldwide threat with a focus on Europe, the U.S. and Canada, using a vulnerability that the manufacturer already patched almost two years ago: (CVE-2021-21974).

Not only VMWare servers themselves at risk

According to IT security portal Hackernews, French provider OVHcloud has confirmed the open source implementation of the IETF Service Location Protocol (OpenSLP) as an entry point.

The threat to IT systems in this case is classified as business-critical – a successful attack with ransomware can therefore cause massive disruptions to regular operations. What is particularly serious about attacks of this type is that under certain circumstances not only institutions that use VMware ESXi themselves are affected, but also third parties – for example, via the server systems hosted in VMware virtualization.

France, Italy, Finland, Canada and the U.S.

Suspicions that European organizations and institutions were the main focus of attackers in the latest wave of attacks were also confirmed a few days later, when the Italian National Cybersecurity Agency ACN warned of the vulnerabilities and a “large-scale wave of attacks.” A Reuters report also speaks of attacks in Finland and the United States.

Users can protect themselves, however: The manufacturer VMware advises upgrading to the latest version of its software – and installing the patch. In general, systems like Greenbone Vulnerability Management help prevent such intrusions by finding the unpatched gaps and proactively warning administrators in reports.

Checking with the Greenbone Cloud

Installation of the VMware patch is free, as is an audit of their systems with the Greenbone Cloud Service Trial. In general, administrators should always ensure that all backups are secured against ransomware and examine log files for suspicious system access – the BSI lists six questions on the checklist in its warning that every administrator should ask themselves now.


Contact Free Trial Buy Here Back to Overview

/by